Yes, I admit immigration is a problem. But it is not a problem we should shut ourselves away from. The problem for the BNP seems to stand at the economical difficulties that they find it brings, alongside their hurt pride. Am I being neive to take the idea of immigration right back to the start? Britain - that same Britain that the BNP argue to represent - is a Christian community. Is it Christian to 'Reject all asylum seekers who passed safe countries on their way to Britain'? Or how about the idea that the BNP wish to offer those of foreign decent who live in Britain a 'generous grant' to leave permanently?
As a wealthy country we should seek to help those who are less fortunate. Immigrants do not risk the dangerous journey to move to Britain on a whim. They are escaping from war. They are escaping from dictatorship. They are escaping from immoral laws and painful deaths. Who are the BNP to think that we can turn those in need away?
A little while ago I came across a blog ironically named 'Babes of the BNP' on blog site Viceland.com. It interviews full-time mum Rebecca, wife of a BNP politician. She's asked questions such as 'Who do you dislike more, muslims or jews'. She decides on the latter. She is also asked whether she thinks the 'vicious rumours' about Griffin being gay are true or not. The next 'babe' to be interviewed is Jo, and she is asked who she dislikes most, Muslims or Hindus. She replies;
"Muslims. They're the ones who've got the most attention, they're the ones who are kicking off about things the most. They're more in the public eye as trouble makers".
Well excuse me for being bias in the fact that I'm not racist - but what a ridiculous statement. Do any of the below people look there of Hindu decent? Crime and trouble is not dependent on religion or ethnic origin.
The BNP are proud to be British. I'd be a lot more proud of them if they gave help to those in need.
No comments:
Post a Comment